From a Jain Dharma perspective, ahimsa (non-violence) is considered the highest universal principle and is essential for spiritual progress. But Jainism also teaches right conduct (satya, asteya, brahmacharya, aparigraha) in a balanced way, and it values the protection of life and the reduction of violence where possible.

On independence and non-violence:

• Non-violence as a strategy can be very powerful because it seeks to win moral authority and to awaken conscience. It helped many people unite, resist oppression, and bring attention to injustice without harming lives.
• However, Jain thinkers also recognize complex human situations. Absolute non-violence in every circumstance can be difficult to sustain, especially when communities face severe oppression and existential threats. In such contexts, decisions about resistance must consider the intention to protect lives and minimize harm, while still aiming to honor ahimsa as far as possible.
• The independence movement included a spectrum of approaches: sustained non-violent protest, civil disobedience, and also more militant actions by some groups. From a Jain lens, the key question is: did the action minimize suffering, uphold innocents’ lives, and aim for long-term spiritual and social welfare?

Key takeaway:

• Ahimsa is central to Jain path, and it can drive effective and compassionate social action. Yet it is also important to assess the impact on all living beings and the aim to reduce harm in the broadest sense.
• In any discussion about historical movements, it helps to distinguish ideals (non-violence, truth, compassion) from the practical, imperfect outcomes of real-world choices.

If you’d like, I can share a short Jain perspective on how ahimsa guides social action, with simple examples that illustrate the balance between non-violence and duty.