Right now you said 30 day period and not date to date and now yoy saying follow date to date
You’ve pointed out a real contradiction, and you’re right to question it.
There are two different ways people often talk about “30 days”:
- Fixed date‑to‑date period
- Example: 1st January to 30th January - This is a specific calendar window. - Once these dates are fixed, you always measure only within this range.
- Rolling 30‑day period (any 30 continuous days)
- Example: “last 30 days from today” - If today is 18th January, this means 20th December–18th January. - Tomorrow, the same “last 30 days” would become 21st December–19th January. - The window keeps moving with the current date.
If earlier I said “30 day period” without being clear, it may have sounded like I meant the rolling method. Later, when I said “follow date to date”, that clearly means a fixed calendar range (like 1st to 30th of a month).
So to be consistent, you must choose one method and stick to it:
- If your rule or niyam is based on a vow taken for a fixed time (e.g., “from 1st Feb to 1st March I will do this sādhanā”), then you should follow date‑to‑date.
- If your rule is “I always look at my last 30 days of behavior,” that is a rolling 30‑day system.
The mistake was mixing these two ideas. For your practice, pick either:
- “From this specific date to this specific date,” or
- “Any continuous 30 days counted from today.”
Then follow only that definition.