If a mithyadriahthi jeev unknowingly kills a jeev, does he get the feelings to go to sadhu n take prayaschit. How do samyagdrishti and mithyadriahthi jeev react in such situation. What difference is seen
Important point first:
- Yes, even a mithyādṛṣṭi (wrong‑believing) jīva can feel regret and go to a sādhū for prāyaścitta.
Let’s keep this very simple and compare both.
---
1. Basic Jain view: what really gives bondage?
- In any hiṁsā, two things matter:
- Unknowingly killing a jīva:
---
2. How a samyakdṛṣṭi jīva reacts
A samyakdṛṣṭi jīva has right faith in tattva (soul, karma, hiṁsā, etc.). So:
- Immediate inner awareness
- The moment he knows, “Some jīva has died because of me,” a soft, pure regret arises: - “Through my activities, another soul suffered – this is not good for my own soul.”
- No hatred, no depression, no self‑destruction
- He doesn’t go into “I’m horrible, everything is over.” - He remembers: this is my own past karma’s result; now I must purify my bhāva.
- Prompt spiritual response
- He goes towards dharma: - Does alochanā–pratikraman–pratyākhyān. - If guided by a Guru, takes prāyaścitta from a sadhu / āchārya (as per tradition). - He tries to increase alertness (apramāda) so it doesn’t happen again.
- Less moha, more responsibility
- He does not say, “It happened unknowingly, so no problem at all.” - He accepts: “Physical hiṁsā happened; I must become more careful and purify my inner state.”
Result:
- Karmic bondage is less, because:
---
3. How a mithyādṛṣṭi jīva reacts
Mithyādṛṣṭi = wrong view / no faith in real tattvas (or very weak/shaky).
He also can feel bad, but usually:
- Feeling is more worldly
- He feels: - Fear: “Will I get punished? Will people blame me?” - Attachment: “My image, my loss, my comfort.” - Often does not connect it deeply with: - “This is karmic bondage to my soul; I must change my inner bhāva.”
- Two common reactions (both possible in different people):
- (a) Hardness / Justification - “It was by mistake; what can I do? Everyone kills something.” - No real inner repentance. - (b) Emotional disturbance - Cries, gets scared, panics, - But still without right understanding of tattva, so it doesn’t become true prāyaścitta.
- Going to a sadhu?
- He may go to a sadhu / temple: - Because family says, - Or fear, - Or to “cancel” sin mechanically. - But if right faith is not awakened, this remains more ritualistic, less soul‑centric.
- Less stable change
- Even if he feels bad for some time, without samyak‑darshan his: - Alertness doesn’t become strong, - Same kind of hiṁsā may repeat again and again.
Result:
- Karmic bondage can still be heavy, because:
---
4. Main visible difference between the two
In the same event (unknowingly killing a jīva):
Samyakdṛṣṭi jīva
- Atma‑centered thinking: “My soul, its purity, its bondage.”
- Soft, humble regret (lājjā, vinay, karuṇā).
- Natural move towards:
- Uses the incident as a step towards spiritual growth.
Mithyādṛṣṭi jīva
- World‑centered thinking: “Me, my fear, my image, my benefit.”
- Either:
- Even if he does some ritual, often:
So the external act of going to a sadhu / temple can look same, but the inner drishti and bhāva are very different – and that decides the karma‑bandh.
---
5. In simple words
- Unknowingly killing is also hiṁsā, but lighter if there is no negligence or bad passion.
- Both samyakdṛṣṭi and mithyādṛṣṭi can feel bad.
- Real spiritual difference:
If you want, you can also read more on concepts like samyak‑drishti and hiṁsā–bhāva here