what is the difference between questions asked by Skandaka and kalashyaveshi putra to Mahavir Bhagwan
Here is the basic difference in very simple words:
1) Questions of Skandaka (Parivrajaka monk) to Bhagwan Mahavir
- Type of questions:
- Main subject:
- Purpose:
---
2) Questions of Kalāsyaveśi-putra (Kalashyaveshi’s son) to Bhagwan’s elder disciples
The story is usually told like this (in short):
- Kalāsyaveśi’s son (or a householder in Kalasyaveshi’s house, depending on version) had been doing Samayik again and again.
- One day he asks the sthavirs/elders (and through them, it is linked to Mahavir’s teaching):
The elders answer in the spirit of Mahavir’s teaching:
- Real samayik is not just sitting for 48 minutes or outward posture.
- Real samayik = staying in the nature of the soul (atma‑swabhav), free from raag‑dvesh (attachment and aversion).
- So his questions are mainly about spiritual practice: “What is right samayik, how many real samayiks have I actually done?”
---
3) Core difference between their questions
- Skandaka:
- Kalāsyaveśi-putra:
In short:
- Skandaka’s questions: “What is this universe and soul really like (finite or infinite)?”
- Kalāsyaveśi-putra’s questions: “What is real samayik, and have my samayiks been true or only external?”
Both are beautiful in their own way: Skandaka seeks right understanding of reality, Kalāsyaveśi-putra seeks right practice in daily sadhana.