So is temple darshan, written in agama
Short answer: Yes – darshan of Jina idols/temples is rooted in the Agamas and early Jain literature, not just a later custom.
A bit more clearly:
- Word used in Agamas
- The Agamas (especially Śvetāmbara) use terms like “chaitya”, “jinālaya”, “stupa”, “āyatana” for places where the Jina is venerated. - They also describe going to the chaitya, bowing, doing vandan, pradakṣiṇā, kāyotsarga, etc. This is the base for what we today call mandir darshan / chaitya‑vandan.
- Purpose in scriptural view
- The aim is bhāva‑pūjā: - remember the qualities of Arihant–Siddha, - develop vinay (deep respect, humility), - reduce ego, anger, greed, attachment and inspire samyak darshan. - The stone or metal itself is not the “giver” of fruits; the inner bhāva is praised in Jain Agamas and commentaries.
- Digambar–Śvetāmbara angle
- Śvetāmbara Mūrtipūjak: present chaitya‑vandan exactly as a temple ritual (Navkār, Logassa, Iriyāvahiyam, Khamāsamaṇa, etc.), based on Agamic sutras recited in front of the Jina image. - Śvetāmbara Sthānakvāsī / Terāpanth: accept Agamas, but avoid images; they still do pratikraman, samayik, Navkār, Iriyāvahiyam, etc., facing a clean space instead of a murti. - Digambar: their own canon is different, but devapūjā, abhiṣek, vandan to Pañca‑Parameṣṭhī and Jina‑mandir darshan are clearly prescribed in their paddhatis and older texts.
- So, is “temple darshan” Agamic or only traditional?
- The form (current detailed rituals, timings, etc.) is shaped by tradition and ācāryas over time. - The principle – going to Jina’s place, bowing, doing vandan, recalling Tīrthaṅkaras and purifying bhāva – is firmly rooted in Agamic teaching and early Jain āgama‑based literature.
If you want, I can quote a few exact Agamic lines that show going to chaitya and doing vandan, and then explain them in very simple Hindi/English.