Why are there different sects like Digambar, swetambar , sthanakvasi? How did they form
In Jainism, all sects accept the same basic truths – ahimsa, anekāntavād, karma, moksha, 24 Tirthankars, etc. The sects formed later in history because of differences in practice, discipline and interpretation of scriptures, not because of disagreement on core principles.
Below is a simple overview.
---
1. How did Digambar and Shwetambar separation happen?
Historical background
- After Bhagwan Mahavir’s nirvāṇa (527 BCE, according to Jain tradition), his teachings were preserved orally by monks and nuns.
- A few centuries later, a long famine is mentioned in Jain tradition (often connected with Āchārya Bhadrabāhu and Chandragupta Maurya).
- Because of this:
Over time, these two groups developed different ways of living and preserving the scriptures, which slowly hardened into two main sects:
- Digambar – “sky‑clad”, i.e. naked monks
- Shwetambar – “white‑clad”, i.e. monks and nuns wearing white clothes
The exact date and details of the split are told differently in Digambar and Shwetambar traditions, but both agree that:
- It happened several centuries after Mahavir,
- It grew gradually – not in a single day.
Main differences (very simply)
These are outer and doctrinal differences, not differences in the basic path:
Digambar:
- Monks practice complete nudity (no possession, even of clothes).
- Believe that a woman must take birth as a man to attain final liberation.
- Jain scriptures they follow are mainly texts like Āchārya Kundkund’s works, etc. The old Āgams are considered lost.
Shwetambar:
- Monks and nuns wear simple white clothes.
- Accept that women can attain liberation directly.
- Have a preserved Āgam canon (11 Angs etc., especially after the council at Valabhi around 5th–6th century CE, according to tradition).
Despite these, both:
- Worship the same Tirthankars,
- Accept the same five great vows (mahāvratas),
- Aim for the same moksha.
---
2. How did Sthanakvasi form within Shwetambar?
Within Shwetambar itself, later reform movements arose.
Origin of Sthanakvasi
- Around the 15th century CE, a reform-minded group questioned:
- From earlier reformers (like the Lonka tradition), finally a distinct group emerged called Sthanakvasi.
“Sthānak” means a simple hall / place, so:
- They do not build or use idol temples.
- They pray, do samayik, pratikraman, lectures, etc. in simple halls called sthanak or upāshray.
- They consider internal purity, meditation, right conduct more important than external idol‑worship.
So:
- Shwetambar Murti‑Pujak – Shwetambar who worship idols in temples.
- Shwetambar Sthanakvasi – Shwetambar who do not worship idols and use simple halls instead.
You can read a simple explanation of Shwetambar Sthanakvasi here:
---
3. Why did these sects arise at all?
In short, because of practical issues over time, not because Mahavir taught different paths:
- Geography and history
- Groups moving to different regions (North–South, etc.) developed different habits and rules.
- Preservation of scriptures
- When teachings are preserved orally over centuries, different lineages remember and record them differently.
- Lifestyle and discipline debates
- How strict should monks be? - Is nudity essential, or is white cloth allowed? - How should worship be done – with idols, or without idols? These questions created groups with different answers.
- Reform movements
- When some Jains felt practices had become too ritualistic or not strict enough, they started reform sects (like Sthanakvasi) to return, in their view, to Mahavir’s original simplicity.
---
4. Essence to remember
- Mahavir’s path is one – all Jain sects accept this.
- Sects are mainly about outer form (clothes, idols, texts used, monastic rules).
- The inner goal is the same:
So Digambar, Shwetambar, Sthanakvasi, Terapanthi, etc. are like different branches of the same tree of Jain Dharma.