In Jainism, the short and clear answer is:

• No, Jains do not “accept Hindu gods” as creators, rulers of the universe, or givers of moksha.
• Yes, Jains do accept that many such beings (Shiva, Vishnu, Lakshmi, etc.) can exist as powerful devas/devis within saṁsār (the cycle of birth and death). They are souls, not supreme God.

What Jains actually worship

In Jain Dharma, proper worship is directed to:

1. Arihant Bhagwan – living or recently-liberated Omniscient beings.
2. Siddha Bhagwan – fully liberated souls, beyond birth and death.
3. Sadhu / Acharya – true monks following the path.
4. Jin-vani / Agam – true Jain scriptures.

These are our real “Gods” in the Jain sense (perfect souls), not Hindu gods like Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, etc. ( jainknowledge.com)

Then why do we see Hindu-like deities in many Jain temples?

• Forms like Lakshmi, Saraswati, Ganesha, Yaksha–Yakshini, Kshetrapal may be present in or around Jain temples.
• In Jainism they are understood as:

- Devas/devis or protector deities, - respected for auspiciousness, knowledge, or protection, - not as creators of the universe or givers of liberation. ( jainknowledge.com)

So images may look “Hindu”, but the Jain meaning is different.

Do any traditions differ (Digambar / Shvetambar)?

• Both traditions agree:

- Moksha comes only by following Tirthankar’s path (Ratnatray). - No Hindu god is accepted as supreme lord or as the direct giver of moksha.

• Differences are only in:

- which protector deities are emphasized, - how much iconography (like Ganesha, Padmavati, Manibhadra, etc.) is used in actual practice. ( jainknowledge.com)

Summary

• Jains respect all souls, including those whom Hindus call gods.
• But Jain Dharma does not accept any Hindu god as a creator, controller of karma, or shortcut to moksha.
• For a Jain, the highest refuge is always: Arihant, Siddha, Acharya, Upadhyaya, and true Sadhu, and the path of right faith, right knowledge, and right conduct.

You can read more in a simple Q&A style here