In Jainism, not exactly “no or yes” — the distinction is more subtle.

• Māyā / moha / rāga: attachment means clinging, possessiveness, dependence, and ego-based pulling toward someone or something. This is bondage-producing.
• Vātsalya / karuṇā / maitrī: affection can be pure, compassionate, and wish for the other’s spiritual and worldly well-being. This is closer to Jain feeling of love.

So, in Jain view:

• Attachment = “I need you for my happiness.”
• Pure affection = “May you be happy and spiritually uplifted, without possessiveness.”

But one must be careful: in ordinary life, what people call “affection” often still contains some attachment. In the pure Jain sense, true affection is compassion without clinging.

So your statement is partly yes:

• attachment is egoistic clinging — yes.
• affection is true deep love — only if it is free from possessiveness and ego.

In Jain dharma, the ideal is love with non-attachment.