Jainism is a spiritual and philosophical path, not a scientific theory. So it does not claim that every doctrine must be proven by science in the modern sense.

If a concept is scientifically refuted but appears in Jain texts or tradition, Jain understanding would usually be one of these:

1. It is not meant as a scientific claim

It may be a spiritual, ethical, or karmic teaching.

1. It belongs to a different domain of knowledge

Jainism distinguishes between material, empirical knowledge and subtle karmic or spiritual realities.

1. The teaching is interpreted symbolically or doctrinally

Some points are understood through Jain philosophy, not laboratory proof.

1. If a claim truly conflicts with reason and right understanding, Jain tradition encourages careful examination rather than blind acceptance.

So Jainism does not “support science-refuted ideas” by trying to compete with science. It presents a different framework, centered on jiva, ajiva, karma, ahimsa, and liberation.