Yes, there are some ritualistic and practice-based differences between the Sthanakwasi and Terapanthi sects within Jainism, though both belong to the Śvetāmbara tradition and share a common emphasis on non-idolatry.

Sthanakwasi:

• The Sthanakwasi sect emerged in the 17th century as a reformist movement within the Śvetāmbara tradition.
• Sthanakwasis reject idol worship and temple rituals. They prefer to gather in Sthānakas (simple prayer halls) for worship and discourse.
• Their rituals focus on meditation, recitation of scriptures, and ethical living, rather than elaborate ceremonies or offerings.

Terapanthi:

• The Terapanthi sect was founded by Acharya Bhikshu in the 18th century as a further reform within the non-idolatrous Śvetāmbara path.
• Terapanthis also strictly oppose idol worship and temple rituals. They are known for a more centralized leadership under an Acharya and strict organizational discipline.
• Their rituals are even simpler, emphasizing group prayers, ethical conduct, scriptural study, and obedience to the Acharya’s guidance.

Key Differences:

• Organizational Structure: Terapanthis have a single Acharya system and a more centralized organization, while Sthanakwasis are less centralized.
• Monastic Discipline: Terapanthi monks and nuns are known for stricter discipline regarding possessions and conduct compared to Sthanakwasi monks and nuns.
• Ritual Practice: Both avoid idol worship, but Terapanthis may be stricter in ritual simplicity and uniformity.

In summary, while both Sthanakwasi and Terapanthi sects avoid idol worship and temple rituals, Terapanthis are known for even greater ritual simplicity, stricter monastic discipline, and centralized leadership.