Is Krishna karmas good
In Jainism, the concept of karma is central and applies to all living beings, including revered figures from other traditions. Jain philosophy does not judge individuals based on their identity but evaluates actions (karma) according to the principles of non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness (satya), non-stealing (asteya), celibacy (brahmacharya), and non-possessiveness (aparigraha).
Regarding Krishna, Jain scriptures often mention him as a historical or mythological figure, but from a Jain perspective, actions such as involvement in war (as seen in the Mahabharata) would accumulate negative karma due to the violence and harm caused, regardless of the intention. Jainism places supreme importance on ahimsa (non-violence), and any act that leads to harm of living beings is considered to generate bad karma.
Therefore, from a Jain viewpoint, Krishna's karmas—especially those involving violence—would not be considered good, as they would bind the soul and hinder spiritual progress. Jainism teaches that liberation (moksha) can only be attained by minimizing all types of karma through right faith, right knowledge, and right conduct.