Aap abhi bhi samje nahi ....mene kaha ki acharya ne kaha hai ki khud simandhar swami bhagwan waha mahavideh kshetra main bharat Kshetra ke mahan tirth shetrunjay ka ullekh karte hai unki deshna main ...
Achchha, ab baat samajh aa rahi hai aap kya kehna chah rahe ho. Aapka point yeh hai:
“Kuch Āchāryo ne likhā / kahā hai ki khud Mahāvideh kṣetra ke Tīrthankar Śrī Simandhar Swami apnī deśhnā meṅ hamāre Bhārat kṣetra ke mahān tīrth Śatruñjay (Shetrunjay) kā ullekh karte hain.”
Is viṣay ko bahut sāvdhānī se samajhnā chāhiye:
- Jain siddhānt ke mūl points
- Mahāvideh kṣetra aur Bhārat kṣetra dono Madhya-lok ke alag–alag bhāg haiṅ. - Wahan ke Tīrthankar ko keval-jñān hai, to unko saare loka ka, sab kṣetroṅ ka jñān hai – isliye jñān ke star par unko Bhārat kṣetra, Śatruñjay ādi sab malūm hai, isme koī virodh nahi. - Lekin hamārī upalabdh āgamoṅ meṅ Simandhar Swami ke deśhnā ke śabd aise direct preserved nahi hain jaise Bhagwan Mahāvīr ke sutroṅ meṅ haiṅ.
- “Deśhnā meṅ Śatruñjay ka ullekh” – yah kahan likhā hai?
- Jo classical Śvetāmbara–Digambar āgama–grantha pramāṇik māne jate haiṅ, unmeṅ seedhā aise vāky nahi milte: “Simandhar Swami ne apnī deśhnā meṅ Śatruñjay tīrth ka nām le kar aisa–vaisa kahā.” - Aise statements zyādatar later grantha, kathā–literature, pravachan, ya upadeś meṅ milte haiṅ, jahan Āchārya / Upādhyāy tātparya samjhāne ke liye udāharaṇ dete haiṅ: - Jese: “Jab Mahāvideh kṣetra ke Tīrthankar deśhnā dete honge, to ve Śatruñjay jaise mahān tīrthoṅ ka mahimā bhi batāte honge…” - Yā kuch granthoṅ meṅ bhāv–kathā rūp meṅ aise varṇan miltā hai, jo śabdaś: āgamik vachan nahi, balki vyākhyā–rūp kalpanā / upadeś hotā hai.
- Is baat ko kaise samjheṅ ki maryādā bhi rahe, shraddhā bhi rahe?
- Ārihant ka keval-jñān sarva–kṣetra par hai – isliye aisa mānnā ki Simandhar Swami ko Bhārat kṣetra ke Śatruñjay tīrth kā jñān hai, pūrī tarah Jain tattva ke anurūp hai. - Agar koī Āchārya ne likhā ho ki “unki deśhnā meṅ ullekh hotā hai”, to use do ṭaṅg se samjhnā utpann hotā hai: 1. Tātparya–bhāṣā – arthāt, “Unke keval-jñān aur deśhnā ka viṣay sab tīrthoṅ ka mahimā śāmil kartā hai.” 2. Kathā–racanā – jismeṅ vārtā–rūp meṅ unke mukh se vāky gadhkar tīrth–mahima batāī jātī hai. - Lekin isko aise nahi lena chāhiye ki jaise hamāre pās Mahāvīdeh ke original recorded pravachan–sutra haiṅ jismeṅ line–by–line aise ullekh likhe milte hon.
- Śvetāmbara – Digambar angle
- Dono paramparā meṅ: - Mahāvideh kṣetra, - wahan ke sadā–vartamān Tīrthankar, - aur unka sarv–kṣetra–jñān – ye sab swīkrit tattva haiṅ. - Śrī Simandhar Swami kā nām lekar bhakti, deśhnā se “connection” kā jo viśeṣ zor hai, vo zyādā Śvetāmbara aur kuch viśeṣ sampradāyoṅ (jaise Śrīmad Rājchandra paramparā, Akram Vignan ādi) meṅ dikhāī detā hai. - Digambar granthoṅ meṅ Mahāvideh aur vartamān Tīrthankaroṅ ka siddhānt to vistār se hai, par Śatruñjay–Simandhar kī aisi joint–kathā kam miltī hai.
- Vyavahārī aur tattvik rūp se sahi samajh
- Vyavahār se: - “Mahāvideh ke Tīrthankar, jinmeṅ Simandhar Swami bhī haiṅ, sab loka kā sampūrṇa jñān rakhte haiṅ; is arth meṅ ve Bhārat kṣetra ke Śatruñjay jaise mahān tīrthoṅ ko bhi jaante haiṅ aur unka mahimā deśhnā ka viṣay ban sakti hai.” - Tattvik satarkatā se: - “Hamāre pās jo likhit āgamik granth haiṅ, unmeṅ Simandhar Swami ke mūl pravachan ke rūp meṅ Śatruñjay kā ullekh śabdaś upalabdh nahi; jo hai vo Āchāryoṅ / kathākāroṅ kī vyākhyā aur bhāva–racanā hai.”
Is tarah aap jo keh rahe ho – ki “Āchārya ne kahā hai” – uska bhāv Jain siddhānt ke anusār sambhav hai, lekin use pramukh āgama–sutra ke barābar na mānkar, vyākhyā / upadeś ke star ka vachan mānkar samjhen to maryādā aur shraddhā dono banī rahtī hai.
Mahāvideh kṣetra aur Simandhar Swami par ek saral vistār yahan mil sakta hai Mahāvideh kṣetra ke viṣay meṅ alag se bhi padh sakte haiṅ